uvf_02-21-19
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
uvf_02-21-19 [2019/02/21 07:00] – felix_hardmood_beck | uvf_02-21-19 [2024/06/28 19:11] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ===== Utilitas, Venustas, Firmitas ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | NYUAD Art Gallery | Reading Room\\ | ||
+ | Thursday, February 21, 2019, 9:00 am – 10:15 am | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |< 100% 50px 400px 150px - >| | ||
+ | |||
+ | |04|Michael Thonet, Side Chair, Model No. 14, 1859 |[[: | ||
+ | |05|Charles Rennie Mackintosh, Hill House Chair, 1904 |[[: | ||
+ | |06|Josef Hoffmann, Die Sitzmaschine, | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Discussion topics/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The principles of standardisation (to only use a small range of identical components) and mass production meant that a reduced language of form had to be used. The Thonet chairs thus embody an important keynote of design – high production volume with reductionist aesthetic – that was to remain ascendant in that form until the 1970s. Are those principles still valid? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Comparing the Hill House Chair with the Sitzmaschine, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Identify aspects of functionality and of ornaments in the Sitzmaschine. Is there a function in ornaments, too? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === 2D/3D ressources === | ||
+ | – https:// | ||
+ | – https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||